26 KiB
AppImage Manager Implementation Plan
For Claude: REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task.
Goal: Build a Rust CLI named aim that installs, lists, removes, and review-updates AppImages from multiple source types with full desktop-style integration for user and system scopes.
Architecture: Use a single Rust binary with a thin CLI layer over application services, typed source adapters, a normalized registry, and separate installer/integration/update subsystems. Build the project incrementally with test-first steps so the registry model, source resolution, and update planning remain stable as additional adapters land.
Tech Stack: Rust, Cargo, clap, dialoguer, console, indicatif, serde, toml or sqlite-backed persistence, reqwest, tokio, tempfile, assert_cmd, predicates, insta or similar snapshot tooling.
Task 1: Scaffold the Cargo project and dependency baseline
Files:
- Create:
Cargo.toml - Create:
src/main.rs - Create:
src/lib.rs - Create:
tests/cli_smoke.rs - Create:
.gitignore
Step 1: Write the failing test
use assert_cmd::Command;
#[test]
fn cli_shows_help() {
let mut cmd = Command::cargo_bin("aim").unwrap();
cmd.arg("--help").assert().success();
}
Step 2: Run test to verify it fails
Run: cargo test cli_shows_help --test cli_smoke
Expected: FAIL because the crate and binary do not exist yet
Step 3: Write minimal implementation
Create a minimal Cargo package with the aim binary, library entry point, and an empty main using clap derive to print help successfully.
Step 4: Run test to verify it passes
Run: cargo test cli_shows_help --test cli_smoke
Expected: PASS
Step 5: Commit
git add Cargo.toml src/main.rs src/lib.rs tests/cli_smoke.rs .gitignore
git commit -m "chore: scaffold aim cargo project"
Task 2: Add the command surface and top-level CLI parsing
Files:
- Modify:
src/main.rs - Create:
src/cli/mod.rs - Create:
src/cli/args.rs - Test:
tests/cli_commands.rs
Step 1: Write the failing test
use assert_cmd::Command;
use predicates::str::contains;
#[test]
fn help_lists_expected_commands() {
let mut cmd = Command::cargo_bin("aim").unwrap();
cmd.arg("--help")
.assert()
.success()
.stdout(contains("remove"))
.stdout(contains("list"))
.stdout(contains("update"));
}
Step 2: Run test to verify it fails
Run: cargo test help_lists_expected_commands --test cli_commands
Expected: FAIL because subcommands and positional query parsing are not implemented
Step 3: Write minimal implementation
Implement:
- positional optional query for bare
aim {QUERY} remove {QUERY}listupdate- shared
--systemand--userscope override flags where appropriate
Step 4: Run test to verify it passes
Run: cargo test help_lists_expected_commands --test cli_commands
Expected: PASS
Step 5: Commit
git add src/main.rs src/cli/mod.rs src/cli/args.rs tests/cli_commands.rs
git commit -m "feat: add top-level cli command parsing"
Task 3: Define the core domain types and install scope resolution
Files:
- Create:
src/domain/mod.rs - Create:
src/domain/app.rs - Create:
src/domain/source.rs - Create:
src/domain/update.rs - Create:
src/app/mod.rs - Create:
src/app/scope.rs - Test:
tests/install_scope.rs
Step 1: Write the failing test
use aim::app::scope::{resolve_install_scope, ScopeOverride};
use aim::domain::app::InstallScope;
#[test]
fn explicit_scope_override_beats_effective_user() {
let scope = resolve_install_scope(false, ScopeOverride::System);
assert_eq!(scope, InstallScope::System);
}
Step 2: Run test to verify it fails
AppImage Manager Implementation Plan
For Claude: REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task.
Goal: Build a Rust workspace where aim-core implements AppImage management logic and aim-cli provides a thin terminal frontend for install, list, remove, and review-update flows.
Architecture: Use a Cargo workspace with aim-core holding domain models, services, adapters, registry, installer, and update logic, while aim-cli only parses arguments, renders terminal UX, and delegates to aim-core. Keep client-facing boundaries explicit so a later GUI crate can reuse aim-core without moving logic back out of the library.
Tech Stack: Rust, Cargo, clap, dialoguer, console, indicatif, serde, toml or sqlite-backed persistence, reqwest, tokio, tempfile, assert_cmd, predicates, insta or similar snapshot tooling.
Task 1: Scaffold the Cargo workspace baseline
Files:
- Create:
Cargo.toml - Create:
crates/aim-core/Cargo.toml - Create:
crates/aim-core/src/lib.rs - Create:
crates/aim-cli/Cargo.toml - Create:
crates/aim-cli/src/lib.rs - Create:
crates/aim-cli/src/main.rs - Create:
tests/cli_smoke.rs - Create:
.gitignore
Step 1: Write the failing test
use assert_cmd::Command;
#[test]
fn cli_shows_help() {
let mut cmd = Command::cargo_bin("aim").unwrap();
cmd.arg("--help").assert().success();
}
Step 2: Run test to verify it fails
Run: cargo test cli_shows_help --test cli_smoke
Expected: FAIL because the workspace and binary do not exist yet
Step 3: Write minimal implementation
Create a minimal Cargo workspace with aim-core and aim-cli, wiring the aim binary through aim-cli and exposing a library entry point from aim-core.
Step 4: Run test to verify it passes
Run: cargo test cli_shows_help --test cli_smoke
Expected: PASS
Step 5: Commit
git add Cargo.toml crates/aim-core/Cargo.toml crates/aim-core/src/lib.rs crates/aim-cli/Cargo.toml crates/aim-cli/src/lib.rs crates/aim-cli/src/main.rs tests/cli_smoke.rs .gitignore
git commit -m "chore: scaffold aim workspace"
Task 2: Add the thin CLI command surface
Files:
- Modify:
crates/aim-cli/src/main.rs - Create:
crates/aim-cli/src/cli/mod.rs - Create:
crates/aim-cli/src/cli/args.rs - Test:
tests/cli_commands.rs
Step 1: Write the failing test
use assert_cmd::Command;
use predicates::str::contains;
#[test]
fn help_lists_expected_commands() {
let mut cmd = Command::cargo_bin("aim").unwrap();
cmd.arg("--help")
.assert()
.success()
.stdout(contains("remove"))
.stdout(contains("list"))
.stdout(contains("update"));
}
Step 2: Run test to verify it fails
Run: cargo test help_lists_expected_commands --test cli_commands
Expected: FAIL because subcommands and positional query parsing are not implemented
Step 3: Write minimal implementation
Implement only:
- positional optional query for bare
aim {QUERY} remove {QUERY}listupdate- shared
--systemand--userscope override flags where appropriate
Do not add business logic here beyond command parsing and delegation stubs.
Step 4: Run test to verify it passes
Run: cargo test help_lists_expected_commands --test cli_commands
Expected: PASS
Step 5: Commit
git add crates/aim-cli/src/main.rs crates/aim-cli/src/cli/mod.rs crates/aim-cli/src/cli/args.rs tests/cli_commands.rs
git commit -m "feat: add thin cli command parsing"
Task 3: Define the core domain types and install scope resolution
Files:
- Create:
crates/aim-core/src/domain/mod.rs - Create:
crates/aim-core/src/domain/app.rs - Create:
crates/aim-core/src/domain/source.rs - Create:
crates/aim-core/src/domain/update.rs - Create:
crates/aim-core/src/app/mod.rs - Create:
crates/aim-core/src/app/scope.rs - Test:
tests/install_scope.rs
Step 1: Write the failing test
use aim_core::app::scope::{resolve_install_scope, ScopeOverride};
use aim_core::domain::app::InstallScope;
#[test]
fn explicit_scope_override_beats_effective_user() {
let scope = resolve_install_scope(false, ScopeOverride::System);
assert_eq!(scope, InstallScope::System);
}
Step 2: Run test to verify it fails
Run: cargo test explicit_scope_override_beats_effective_user --test install_scope
Expected: FAIL because core domain types and scope logic do not exist yet
Step 3: Write minimal implementation
Add domain types for:
InstallScopeAppRecordSourceKindSourceRefResolvedReleaseUpdatePlan
Add scope resolution logic that:
- auto-detects by effective privileges
- honors
--systemand--useroverrides
Step 4: Run test to verify it passes
Run: cargo test explicit_scope_override_beats_effective_user --test install_scope
Expected: PASS
Step 5: Commit
git add crates/aim-core/src/domain crates/aim-core/src/app tests/install_scope.rs
git commit -m "feat: add core domain types and scope resolution"
Task 4: Implement query parsing and source reference resolution in aim-core
Files:
- Create:
crates/aim-core/src/app/query.rs - Modify:
crates/aim-core/src/domain/source.rs - Test:
tests/query_resolution.rs
Step 1: Write the failing test
use aim_core::app::query::resolve_query;
use aim_core::domain::source::SourceKind;
#[test]
fn owner_repo_defaults_to_github() {
let source = resolve_query("sharkdp/bat").unwrap();
assert_eq!(source.kind, SourceKind::GitHub);
}
Step 2: Run test to verify it fails
Run: cargo test owner_repo_defaults_to_github --test query_resolution
Expected: FAIL because query resolution is not implemented
Step 3: Write minimal implementation
Support parsing for:
owner/repoas GitHub by default- GitHub URLs
- GitLab URLs and explicit
gitlab:prefix - direct URLs
file://URIs
Return a normalized SourceRef without triggering downloads or installation.
Step 4: Run test to verify it passes
Run: cargo test owner_repo_defaults_to_github --test query_resolution
Expected: PASS
Step 5: Commit
git add crates/aim-core/src/app/query.rs crates/aim-core/src/domain/source.rs tests/query_resolution.rs
git commit -m "feat: resolve user queries into source references"
Task 5: Add registry persistence and migration-friendly app records in aim-core
Files:
- Create:
crates/aim-core/src/registry/mod.rs - Create:
crates/aim-core/src/registry/store.rs - Create:
crates/aim-core/src/registry/model.rs - Test:
tests/registry_roundtrip.rs
Step 1: Write the failing test
use aim_core::registry::store::RegistryStore;
use tempfile::tempdir;
#[test]
fn registry_round_trips_app_records() {
let dir = tempdir().unwrap();
let store = RegistryStore::new(dir.path().join("registry.toml"));
let loaded = store.load().unwrap();
assert!(loaded.apps.is_empty());
}
Step 2: Run test to verify it fails
Run: cargo test registry_round_trips_app_records --test registry_roundtrip
Expected: FAIL because no registry store exists
Step 3: Write minimal implementation
Implement a registry store with:
- serialized root structure
- normalized
AppRecordpersistence - version field for future migrations
- read and write APIs
Choose a storage format that is easy to inspect and migrate, such as TOML or SQLite.
Step 4: Run test to verify it passes
Run: cargo test registry_round_trips_app_records --test registry_roundtrip
Expected: PASS
Step 5: Commit
git add crates/aim-core/src/registry tests/registry_roundtrip.rs
git commit -m "feat: add persistent core registry store"
Task 6: Build the source adapter trait and contract harness in aim-core
Files:
- Create:
crates/aim-core/src/adapters/mod.rs - Create:
crates/aim-core/src/adapters/traits.rs - Create:
crates/aim-core/src/adapters/test_support.rs - Test:
tests/adapter_contract.rs
Step 1: Write the failing test
use aim_core::adapters::traits::AdapterCapabilities;
#[test]
fn adapter_capabilities_can_report_exact_resolution_only() {
let capabilities = AdapterCapabilities::exact_resolution_only();
assert!(!capabilities.supports_search);
}
Step 2: Run test to verify it fails
Run: cargo test adapter_capabilities_can_report_exact_resolution_only --test adapter_contract
Expected: FAIL because adapter abstractions do not exist
Step 3: Write minimal implementation
Define:
SourceAdaptertrait- capability flags
- normalized adapter response types
- reusable test helpers for contract behavior
Do not implement network-backed adapters yet. Focus on the stable core trait surface.
Step 4: Run test to verify it passes
Run: cargo test adapter_capabilities_can_report_exact_resolution_only --test adapter_contract
Expected: PASS
Step 5: Commit
git add crates/aim-core/src/adapters tests/adapter_contract.rs
git commit -m "feat: add source adapter trait and contract surface"
Task 7: Define client interaction models in aim-core and thin terminal rendering in aim-cli
Files:
- Create:
crates/aim-core/src/app/interaction.rs - Create:
crates/aim-cli/src/ui/mod.rs - Create:
crates/aim-cli/src/ui/render.rs - Create:
crates/aim-cli/src/ui/prompt.rs - Test:
tests/ui_summary.rs
Step 1: Write the failing test
use aim_cli::ui::render::render_update_summary;
#[test]
fn update_summary_mentions_selected_count() {
let output = render_update_summary(3, 2, 1);
assert!(output.contains("selected: 2"));
}
Step 2: Run test to verify it fails
Run: cargo test update_summary_mentions_selected_count --test ui_summary
Expected: FAIL because client rendering helpers do not exist
Step 3: Write minimal implementation
Create:
- typed interaction and progress models in
aim-core - a thin CLI UI facade in
aim-clithat centralizes styling withconsole - prompt orchestration using
dialoguer
Do not move any business rules into aim-cli.
Step 4: Run test to verify it passes
Run: cargo test update_summary_mentions_selected_count --test ui_summary
Expected: PASS
Step 5: Commit
git add crates/aim-core/src/app/interaction.rs crates/aim-cli/src/ui tests/ui_summary.rs
git commit -m "feat: add core interaction models and thin cli ui"
Task 8: Implement installer and desktop integration path resolution in aim-core
Files:
- Create:
crates/aim-core/src/integration/mod.rs - Create:
crates/aim-core/src/integration/paths.rs - Create:
crates/aim-core/src/integration/install.rs - Create:
crates/aim-core/src/platform/mod.rs - Test:
tests/install_paths.rs
Step 1: Write the failing test
use aim_core::domain::app::InstallScope;
use aim_core::integration::paths::managed_appimage_path;
use std::path::Path;
#[test]
fn user_scope_path_lands_under_home_managed_dir() {
let path = managed_appimage_path(Path::new("/home/test"), InstallScope::User, "bat");
assert!(path.to_string_lossy().contains("bat"));
}
Step 2: Run test to verify it fails
Run: cargo test user_scope_path_lands_under_home_managed_dir --test install_paths
Expected: FAIL because install path logic does not exist
Step 3: Write minimal implementation
Implement:
- managed install path resolution for user and system scopes
- integration artifact path calculation
- atomic staging and replacement helpers
Keep actual desktop registration side effects behind abstractions so they remain testable.
Step 4: Run test to verify it passes
Run: cargo test user_scope_path_lands_under_home_managed_dir --test install_paths
Expected: PASS
Step 5: Commit
git add crates/aim-core/src/integration crates/aim-core/src/platform tests/install_paths.rs
git commit -m "feat: add core install and integration path handling"
Task 9: Implement identity normalization and raw URL fallback in aim-core
Files:
- Create:
crates/aim-core/src/app/identity.rs - Modify:
crates/aim-core/src/domain/app.rs - Test:
tests/identity_resolution.rs
Step 1: Write the failing test
use aim_core::app::identity::{resolve_identity, IdentityFallback};
#[test]
fn unresolved_identity_can_fall_back_to_url() {
let identity = resolve_identity(None, None, Some("https://example.com/app.AppImage"), IdentityFallback::AllowRawUrl).unwrap();
assert!(identity.stable_id.contains("example.com"));
}
Step 2: Run test to verify it fails
Run: cargo test unresolved_identity_can_fall_back_to_url --test identity_resolution
Expected: FAIL because identity resolution does not exist
Step 3: Write minimal implementation
Implement identity normalization with:
- confident resolution path
- low-confidence state handling
- raw URL fallback when allowed
Keep the prompting decision outside this module so the logic remains deterministic and reusable across CLI and GUI clients.
Step 4: Run test to verify it passes
Run: cargo test unresolved_identity_can_fall_back_to_url --test identity_resolution
Expected: PASS
Step 5: Commit
git add crates/aim-core/src/app/identity.rs crates/aim-core/src/domain/app.rs tests/identity_resolution.rs
git commit -m "feat: add core identity normalization and fallback logic"
Task 10: Implement update planning in aim-core and review-first dispatch in aim-cli
Files:
- Create:
crates/aim-core/src/app/update.rs - Modify:
crates/aim-cli/src/cli/args.rs - Modify:
crates/aim-cli/src/main.rs - Test:
tests/update_planning.rs
Step 1: Write the failing test
use aim_core::app::update::build_update_plan;
#[test]
fn empty_registry_produces_empty_plan() {
let plan = build_update_plan(&[]).unwrap();
assert!(plan.items.is_empty());
}
Step 2: Run test to verify it fails
Run: cargo test empty_registry_produces_empty_plan --test update_planning
Expected: FAIL because update planning does not exist
Step 3: Write minimal implementation
Implement:
- update plan model in
aim-core - comparison of installed state against adapter-provided candidate data
- bare
aimdispatch inaim-cliinto theaim-coreupdate planning path when no positional query is present
Do not execute downloads yet in this task. Focus on planning and command dispatch.
Step 4: Run test to verify it passes
Run: cargo test empty_registry_produces_empty_plan --test update_planning
Expected: PASS
Step 5: Commit
git add crates/aim-core/src/app/update.rs crates/aim-cli/src/cli/args.rs crates/aim-cli/src/main.rs tests/update_planning.rs
git commit -m "feat: add core update planning and cli dispatch"
Task 11: Add the GitHub adapter and one core add flow
Files:
- Create:
crates/aim-core/src/adapters/github.rs - Create:
crates/aim-core/src/app/add.rs - Modify:
crates/aim-core/src/adapters/mod.rs - Modify:
crates/aim-cli/src/main.rs - Test:
tests/github_add_flow.rs
Step 1: Write the failing test
#[test]
fn github_adapter_can_normalize_owner_repo_source() {
let source = aim_core::app::query::resolve_query("sharkdp/bat").unwrap();
assert_eq!(source.kind.as_str(), "github");
}
Step 2: Run test to verify it fails
Run: cargo test github_adapter_can_normalize_owner_repo_source --test github_add_flow
Expected: FAIL because the add flow and GitHub adapter are not wired into the core services
Step 3: Write minimal implementation
Implement:
- GitHub adapter skeleton in
aim-core - add orchestration flow in
aim-corefrom query resolution to normalized release selection - minimal
aim-cliwiring to invoke the add flow - fixture-backed or mocked HTTP path for tests
Step 4: Run test to verify it passes
Run: cargo test github_adapter_can_normalize_owner_repo_source --test github_add_flow
Expected: PASS
Step 5: Commit
git add crates/aim-core/src/adapters/github.rs crates/aim-core/src/app/add.rs crates/aim-core/src/adapters/mod.rs crates/aim-cli/src/main.rs tests/github_add_flow.rs
git commit -m "feat: add github source adapter and core add flow"
Task 12: Add remaining adapters behind the same core contract
Files:
- Create:
crates/aim-core/src/adapters/gitlab.rs - Create:
crates/aim-core/src/adapters/direct_url.rs - Create:
crates/aim-core/src/adapters/zsync.rs - Create:
crates/aim-core/src/adapters/sourceforge.rs - Create:
crates/aim-core/src/adapters/custom_json.rs - Modify:
crates/aim-core/src/adapters/mod.rs - Test:
tests/adapter_smoke.rs
Step 1: Write the failing test
use aim_core::adapters::all_adapter_kinds;
#[test]
fn all_expected_adapter_kinds_are_registered() {
let kinds = all_adapter_kinds();
assert!(kinds.contains(&"gitlab"));
assert!(kinds.contains(&"direct-url"));
assert!(kinds.contains(&"zsync"));
assert!(kinds.contains(&"sourceforge"));
assert!(kinds.contains(&"custom-json"));
}
Step 2: Run test to verify it fails
Run: cargo test all_expected_adapter_kinds_are_registered --test adapter_smoke
Expected: FAIL because the additional adapters do not exist
Step 3: Write minimal implementation
Add adapter modules and register them behind the shared core trait. Keep each adapter bootstrapped with contract-valid behavior and fixture-friendly parsing paths before adding richer source-specific behaviors.
Step 4: Run test to verify it passes
Run: cargo test all_expected_adapter_kinds_are_registered --test adapter_smoke
Expected: PASS
Step 5: Commit
git add crates/aim-core/src/adapters tests/adapter_smoke.rs
git commit -m "feat: add remaining core source adapter skeletons"
Task 13: Implement list and remove in aim-core, keep aim-cli thin
Files:
- Create:
crates/aim-core/src/app/list.rs - Create:
crates/aim-core/src/app/remove.rs - Modify:
crates/aim-cli/src/main.rs - Test:
tests/remove_flow.rs
Step 1: Write the failing test
#[test]
fn remove_flow_rejects_unknown_app_names() {
let result = aim_core::app::remove::resolve_registered_app("bat", &[]);
assert!(result.is_err());
}
Step 2: Run test to verify it fails
Run: cargo test remove_flow_rejects_unknown_app_names --test remove_flow
Expected: FAIL because list and remove services do not exist
Step 3: Write minimal implementation
Implement in aim-core:
- list formatting input model
- registered app name matching
- ambiguity handling hooks through interaction requests
- conservative removal sequencing for artifact and integration cleanup
Add only wiring and rendering in aim-cli.
Step 4: Run test to verify it passes
Run: cargo test remove_flow_rejects_unknown_app_names --test remove_flow
Expected: PASS
Step 5: Commit
git add crates/aim-core/src/app/list.rs crates/aim-core/src/app/remove.rs crates/aim-cli/src/main.rs tests/remove_flow.rs
git commit -m "feat: add core list and remove services"
Task 14: Wire the binary end to end and document the workspace split
Files:
- Modify:
crates/aim-cli/src/main.rs - Modify:
crates/aim-core/src/lib.rs - Test:
tests/end_to_end_cli.rs - Modify:
README.md
Step 1: Write the failing test
use assert_cmd::Command;
use predicates::str::contains;
#[test]
fn list_command_runs_without_registry_entries() {
let mut cmd = Command::cargo_bin("aim").unwrap();
cmd.arg("list").assert().success().stdout(contains("installed"));
}
Step 2: Run test to verify it fails
Run: cargo test list_command_runs_without_registry_entries --test end_to_end_cli
Expected: FAIL because services are not fully wired into the binary
Step 3: Write minimal implementation
Wire all top-level commands through aim-core service APIs and add minimal README usage documentation for:
- add/query flow
- bare update flow
- list
- remove
- scope overrides
Also document that the workspace is intentionally split so a future GUI can reuse aim-core.
Step 4: Run test to verify it passes
Run: cargo test list_command_runs_without_registry_entries --test end_to_end_cli
Expected: PASS
Step 5: Commit
git add crates/aim-cli/src/main.rs crates/aim-core/src/lib.rs tests/end_to_end_cli.rs README.md
git commit -m "feat: wire aim cli to aim-core end to end"
Task 15: Verification sweep and architecture leak check
Files:
- Modify:
README.md - Modify:
.plans/appimage-manager/2026-03-19-appimage-manager-design.md - Modify:
.plans/appimage-manager/2026-03-19-appimage-manager-implementation-plan.md
Step 1: Write the failing test
There is no new product behavior in this task. Instead, identify the highest-risk missing automated check from earlier tasks and add that test first, prioritizing any gap that suggests business logic is drifting into aim-cli.
Step 2: Run test to verify it fails
Run: cargo test
Expected: Identify at least one missing assertion or regression gap before making release-readiness claims
Step 3: Write minimal implementation
Close the smallest meaningful remaining gap. Update docs only where behavior has materially changed from the plan.
Step 4: Run test to verify it passes
Run: cargo test
Expected: PASS
Run: cargo fmt --check
Expected: PASS
Run: cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets --all-features -- -D warnings
Expected: PASS
Step 5: Commit
git add README.md .plans/appimage-manager/2026-03-19-appimage-manager-design.md .plans/appimage-manager/2026-03-19-appimage-manager-implementation-plan.md
git commit -m "chore: finalize appimage manager workspace implementation"
Notes For Execution
- This workspace is currently empty and not initialized as a git repository, so commit steps will remain blocked until
git initor an equivalent repository setup occurs. - The execution session should create a Cargo workspace, not a single binary crate.
- The first adapter should be GitHub because it exercises the
owner/reposhorthand and the most likely early-user path. - Keep custom JSON feed support declarative in v1.
- Do not add a plugin runtime.
- Do not let
aim-cliaccumulate business logic; if a behavior could be reused by a future GUI, it belongs inaim-core.
Plan complete and saved to .plans/appimage-manager/2026-03-19-appimage-manager-implementation-plan.md. Two execution options:
1. Subagent-Driven (this session) - I dispatch a fresh subagent per task, review between tasks, and iterate in this session.
2. Parallel Session (separate) - Open a new session with executing-plans and execute the plan with checkpoints.
Which approach?